Baby Name Popularity Profile

Cole

Data-driven popularity statistics, SSA rankings, and historical trends for the name Cole.

National Rank (2025)
#182
All-Time Peak Rank
#69 (2002)
Total U.S. Births
154,093
Unisex Distribution 99.6% Boy / 0.4% Girl Balance: Overwhelmingly Male
πŸ’‘ The Cole Vibe: This choice is considered a Modern Trend. A contemporary choice reflecting current cultural naming rhythms and popularity brackets.

πŸ“– The Story Behind Cole

According to SSA data, Cole achieved its highest historical rank of #69 in 2002. Its highest annual registration volume occurred in 2002 with 6,038 babies. Between 2015 and 2025, modern registrations have decreased by 42.8%. Overall, the name has maintained a ranked presence for 117 consecutive years.

πŸ“Š Factual Timeline & Current Trajectory (1880 – 2025)

Watch how the absolute registration footprint of the name Cole scaled historically over the last century:

5-Year Trajectory Velocity Declining
10-Year Decadal Shift Change -42.8% Decline
18801920196020002025

πŸ“ˆ Popularity Milestones & Volatility

Busiest Year on Record 6,038 Births in 2002
Years in Top 100
15 yrs
Registry Appearance Streak
117 Years
Historical Volatility Highly Volatile
Decade-by-Decade Registration Volumes
1880s: 6
1890s: 5
1900s: 16
1910s: 190
1920s: 156
1930s: 127
1940s: 224
1950s: 562
1960s: 703
1970s: 1,444
1980s: 8,722
1990s: 33,868
2000s: 56,846
2010s: 36,401
2020s: 14,823

πŸ“ Sound & Spelling Structure

Phonetic Syllables Cole
Letter Count 4 Letters
Spelling Complexity Easy
Linguistic Profile Narrative: It is an isogram, meaning no two letters are repeated. Longer than 1.4% of SSA names. Starts with C, a letter used by only 5.7% of SSA names.

πŸ› οΈ Rhythm & Cadence Engine

Need a middle name or matching choice that pairs cleanly with Cole? Enter a surname or older sibling name below to test structural meter and syllable cohesion:

πŸ“ Authentic State & Regional Rankings

Highest Ranking Local Zone State Utah
Strongest Geographic Region Footprint South
States with Core Active Data 51 States Regions
State Region 2025 Absolute Rank Total Historical Births Peak Year 5-Year Velocity
Utah #137 2,854 2009 2.6% Decline
Alaska Unranked 467 1997 Insufficient historical volume
Montana #160 969 2000 Insufficient historical volume
North Dakota Unranked 1,049 1998 Insufficient historical volume
Nevada #231 1,010 2006 Insufficient historical volume
South Dakota #153 991 1997 Insufficient historical volume
Minnesota #210 5,266 1997 38.0% Decline
New Hampshire #66 896 2009 Insufficient historical volume
Idaho #219 1,125 2007 Insufficient historical volume
Oregon #235 2,456 1997 35.7% Decline
Nebraska #231 1,985 2002 Insufficient historical volume
Delaware #175 533 2002 Insufficient historical volume
Colorado #163 3,095 2000 Stable
Washington #223 4,165 2000 7.7% Decline
Arizona #232 2,987 2004 18.6% Decline
Iowa #195 3,228 1998 32.3% Decline
Wyoming Unranked 329 2002 Insufficient historical volume
Kansas #200 2,437 1998 35.5% Decline
Wisconsin #186 4,581 1998 45.9% Decline
Vermont Unranked 366 2001 Insufficient historical volume
Maine #130 862 2005 Insufficient historical volume
Missouri #156 4,317 2005 23.7% Decline
Indiana #255 4,334 2004 54.9% Decline
Florida #209 5,934 2005 21.4% Decline
Hawaii #225 519 2001 Insufficient historical volume
Maryland #129 2,506 2002 38.7% Decline
Connecticut #90 1,804 2008 29.1% Decline
Oklahoma #258 2,225 2002 29.6% Decline
Rhode Island #72 567 2008 Insufficient historical volume
Massachusetts #67 3,801 2001 6.9% Decline
Pennsylvania #105 8,263 2009 39.5% Decline
Ohio #170 7,120 2002 31.6% Decline
Virginia #150 3,299 2009 27.4% Decline
Michigan #109 5,385 2002 2.2% Decline
California #259 14,093 2000 34.8% Decline
Louisiana #154 2,478 2007 +3.1% Growth
New Jersey #104 3,738 2009 22.5% Decline
Illinois #157 6,341 2002 36.7% Decline
Texas #286 9,824 2006 31.1% Decline
Arkansas #201 1,364 2008 Insufficient historical volume
North Carolina #224 3,405 2007 41.1% Decline
Georgia #428 3,109 2002 36.6% Decline
Tennessee #260 2,249 2008 17.1% Decline
West Virginia #171 964 2003 Insufficient historical volume
New Mexico #220 551 2004 Insufficient historical volume
Kentucky #173 1,683 2007 8.6% Decline
South Carolina #268 1,294 2009 Insufficient historical volume
New York #111 6,573 2008 25.5% Decline
Alabama #379 1,242 2008 Insufficient historical volume
District of Columbia #174 250 2004 Insufficient historical volume
Mississippi #221 629 2006 Insufficient historical volume

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§ Sibling Name Suggestions

πŸ‘¦ Brother Suggestions
πŸ‘§ Sister Suggestions

πŸ”— Names You Might Also Like

If you love the internal rhythm structural framework metrics of Cole, consider these high-cohesion alternative profiles:

Demographic & Volume Sound Character Peers

πŸ—‚οΈ Browse More Baby Names Directory

Explore our programmatic data indexes across multi-variate sorting tracks safely: