Baby Name Popularity Profile

Daxton

Data-driven popularity statistics, SSA rankings, and historical trends for the name Daxton.

National Rank (2025)
#379
All-Time Peak Rank
#279 (2019)
Total U.S. Births
14,934
Unisex Distribution 100.0% Boy / 0.0% Girl Balance: Single-Gender Archetype
πŸ’‘ The Daxton Vibe: This choice is considered a Modern Trend. A contemporary choice reflecting current cultural naming rhythms and popularity brackets.

πŸ“– The Story Behind Daxton

According to SSA data, Daxton achieved its highest historical rank of #279 in 2019. Its highest annual registration volume occurred in 2019 with 1,276 babies. Between 2015 and 2025, modern registrations have decreased by 1.9%. Overall, the name has maintained a ranked presence for 36 consecutive years.

πŸ“Š Factual Timeline & Current Trajectory (1880 – 2025)

Watch how the absolute registration footprint of the name Daxton scaled historically over the last century:

5-Year Trajectory Velocity Declining
10-Year Decadal Shift Change -1.9% Decline
18801920196020002025

πŸ“ˆ Popularity Milestones & Volatility

Busiest Year on Record 1,276 Births in 2019
Years in Top 100
0 yrs
Registry Appearance Streak
36 Years
Historical Volatility Highly Volatile
Decade-by-Decade Registration Volumes
1880s: 0
1890s: 0
1900s: 0
1910s: 0
1920s: 0
1930s: 0
1940s: 0
1950s: 0
1960s: 0
1970s: 58
1980s: 11
1990s: 274
2000s: 1,392
2010s: 7,355
2020s: 5,844

πŸ“ Sound & Spelling Structure

Phonetic Syllables Dax-ton
Letter Count 6 Letters
Spelling Complexity Moderate
Linguistic Profile Narrative: It is an isogram, meaning no two letters are repeated. Longer than 25.7% of SSA names. Starts with D, a letter used by only 6.6% of SSA names.

πŸ› οΈ Rhythm & Cadence Engine

Need a middle name or matching choice that pairs cleanly with Daxton? Enter a surname or older sibling name below to test structural meter and syllable cohesion:

πŸ“ Authentic State & Regional Rankings

Highest Ranking Local Zone State Utah
Strongest Geographic Region Footprint South
States with Core Active Data 47 States Regions
State Region 2025 Absolute Rank Total Historical Births Peak Year 5-Year Velocity
Utah #195 1,343 2013 34.9% Decline
Idaho #205 302 2019 Insufficient historical volume
Oklahoma #191 653 2018 18.8% Decline
Wyoming Unranked 53 2019 Insufficient historical volume
Nevada #331 117 2020 Insufficient historical volume
North Dakota #176 110 2021 Insufficient historical volume
Arkansas #208 349 2021 Insufficient historical volume
Kansas #280 317 2015 Insufficient historical volume
South Dakota Unranked 97 2020 Insufficient historical volume
Arizona #685 329 2016 66.7% Decline
Colorado #637 290 2019 71.4% Decline
Montana Unranked 70 2021 Insufficient historical volume
Nebraska #216 162 2017 Insufficient historical volume
Missouri #222 477 2018 13.5% Decline
Iowa #263 266 2023 Insufficient historical volume
Oregon #358 175 2018 Insufficient historical volume
Indiana #285 452 2019 28.2% Decline
Tennessee #256 395 2019 7.9% Decline
Washington #700 299 2020 76.3% Decline
Kentucky #156 306 2025 +16.7% Growth
Mississippi #222 198 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Louisiana #241 264 2016 Insufficient historical volume
Texas #581 1,100 2019 37.9% Decline
Minnesota #397 262 2020 56.2% Decline
Alabama #227 261 2021 3.8% Decline
Wisconsin #264 274 2020 29.0% Decline
Florida #546 462 2018 23.8% Decline
Ohio #254 595 2020 25.4% Decline
North Carolina #480 358 2019 Insufficient historical volume
West Virginia #268 107 2020 Insufficient historical volume
Alaska Unranked 15 2013 Insufficient historical volume
Michigan #295 396 2018 2.9% Decline
Georgia #443 289 2019 3.8% Decline
Maine #241 45 2018 Insufficient historical volume
Hawaii Unranked 30 2021 Insufficient historical volume
South Carolina #390 127 2022 Insufficient historical volume
Virginia #749 191 2019 Insufficient historical volume
California #628 832 2019 27.4% Decline
Illinois #612 398 2020 61.5% Decline
Maryland #349 116 2022 Insufficient historical volume
Pennsylvania #296 398 2020 13.3% Decline
New Hampshire #191 22 2025 Insufficient historical volume
New Mexico #378 37 2018 Insufficient historical volume
Massachusetts #564 87 2019 Insufficient historical volume
New York #806 250 2022 41.4% Decline
New Jersey #947 71 2020 Insufficient historical volume
Connecticut #510 15 2020 Insufficient historical volume

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§ Sibling Name Suggestions

πŸ”— Names You Might Also Like

If you love the internal rhythm structural framework metrics of Daxton, consider these high-cohesion alternative profiles:

Demographic & Volume Sound Character Peers

πŸ—‚οΈ Browse More Baby Names Directory

Explore our programmatic data indexes across multi-variate sorting tracks safely: