Data-driven SSA statistics, rankings, and historical trends for Frank.
FRANK
Annual registration volume (number of births) for Frank across 146 years of SSA data.
Enter a surname or sibling name to test how it pairs with Frank.
| State | 2025 Rank | Total Births | Peak Year | 5-Yr Velocity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | #246 | 47,198 | 1923 | 9.3% Decline |
| New York | #314 | 122,882 | 1920 | +3.6% Growth |
| Connecticut | #255 | 16,308 | 1918 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Rhode Island | Unranked | 5,427 | 1921 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Pennsylvania | #512 | 75,565 | 1918 | 29.6% Decline |
| New Mexico | Unranked | 6,372 | 1947 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Massachusetts | #526 | 25,621 | 1917 | 65.4% Decline |
| Wyoming | Unranked | 1,400 | 1921 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Illinois | #405 | 50,914 | 1918 | 38.6% Decline |
| Montana | Unranked | 2,916 | 1918 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Mississippi | Unranked | 11,228 | 1927 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Delaware | Unranked | 1,784 | 1956 | Insufficient historical volume |
| District of Columbia | Unranked | 3,891 | 1948 | Insufficient historical volume |
| West Virginia | Unranked | 8,080 | 1921 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Ohio | #633 | 39,108 | 1918 | 40.0% Decline |
| Louisiana | #503 | 14,845 | 1948 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Maine | #217 | 3,545 | 1922 | Insufficient historical volume |
| South Carolina | Unranked | 11,477 | 1918 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Arizona | #435 | 9,583 | 1955 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Michigan | #496 | 29,372 | 1918 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Alabama | #799 | 14,198 | 1923 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Vermont | Unranked | 1,324 | 1916 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Hawaii | Unranked | 2,346 | 1944 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Alaska | Unranked | 1,044 | 1956 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Colorado | #706 | 8,767 | 1918 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Nebraska | Unranked | 5,219 | 1918 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Maryland | #595 | 10,713 | 1947 | Insufficient historical volume |
| New Hampshire | Unranked | 2,149 | 1919 | Insufficient historical volume |
| California | #533 | 67,546 | 1959 | 28.4% Decline |
| Kansas | Unranked | 6,939 | 1921 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Missouri | #572 | 14,416 | 1920 | Insufficient historical volume |
| North Dakota | Unranked | 2,176 | 1916 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Virginia | #534 | 14,034 | 1924 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Wisconsin | #583 | 11,894 | 1918 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Georgia | #657 | 16,690 | 1920 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Tennessee | #610 | 12,454 | 1921 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Oklahoma | Unranked | 7,883 | 1920 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Arkansas | Unranked | 6,260 | 1920 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Kentucky | Unranked | 9,941 | 1923 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Texas | #617 | 42,095 | 1947 | 19.4% Decline |
| Idaho | Unranked | 2,176 | 1918 | Insufficient historical volume |
| North Carolina | #692 | 14,822 | 1918 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Indiana | #988 | 12,240 | 1918 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Washington | #753 | 8,335 | 1921 | Insufficient historical volume |
| South Dakota | Unranked | 1,712 | 1918 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Florida | #385 | 17,284 | 1959 | +42.9% Growth |
| Oregon | #553 | 4,406 | 1948 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Iowa | Unranked | 6,321 | 1920 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Minnesota | #346 | 8,376 | 1916 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Nevada | #308 | 1,478 | 1962 | Insufficient historical volume |
| Utah | #531 | 3,311 | 1918 | Insufficient historical volume |
Based on statistical similarity and shared characteristics with Frank:
Similar Names More Traditional NamesExplore our name indexes and data tracks: