Baby Name Popularity Profile

Hunter

Data-driven popularity statistics, SSA rankings, and historical trends for the name Hunter.

National Rank (2025)
#130
All-Time Peak Rank
#35 (2000)
Total U.S. Births
262,238
Unisex Distribution 94.8% Boy / 5.2% Girl Balance: Overwhelmingly Male
πŸ’‘ The Hunter Vibe: This choice is considered a Modern Trend. A contemporary choice reflecting current cultural naming rhythms and popularity brackets.

πŸ“– The Story Behind Hunter

According to SSA data, Hunter achieved its highest historical rank of #35 in 2000. Its highest annual registration volume occurred in 2000 with 12,538 babies. Between 2015 and 2025, modern registrations have decreased by 67.0%. Overall, the name has maintained a ranked presence for 138 consecutive years.

πŸ“Š Factual Timeline & Current Trajectory (1880 – 2025)

Watch how the absolute registration footprint of the name Hunter scaled historically over the last century:

5-Year Trajectory Velocity Declining
10-Year Decadal Shift Change -67.0% Decline
18801920196020002025

πŸ“ˆ Popularity Milestones & Volatility

Busiest Year on Record 12,538 Births in 2000
Years in Top 100
29 yrs
Registry Appearance Streak
138 Years
Historical Volatility Highly Volatile
Decade-by-Decade Registration Volumes
1880s: 84
1890s: 101
1900s: 125
1910s: 419
1920s: 576
1930s: 393
1940s: 470
1950s: 576
1960s: 764
1970s: 1,215
1980s: 5,871
1990s: 60,524
2000s: 94,860
2010s: 74,919
2020s: 21,341

πŸ“ Sound & Spelling Structure

Phonetic Syllables Hun-ter
Letter Count 6 Letters
Spelling Complexity Moderate
Linguistic Profile Narrative: It is an isogram, meaning no two letters are repeated. Longer than 25.7% of SSA names. Starts with H, a letter used by only 2.2% of SSA names.

πŸ› οΈ Rhythm & Cadence Engine

Need a middle name or matching choice that pairs cleanly with Hunter? Enter a surname or older sibling name below to test structural meter and syllable cohesion:

πŸ“ Authentic State & Regional Rankings

Highest Ranking Local Zone State Alaska
Strongest Geographic Region Footprint South
States with Core Active Data 51 States Regions
State Region 2025 Absolute Rank Total Historical Births Peak Year 5-Year Velocity
Alaska #80 920 2000 Insufficient historical volume
Nevada #108 1,855 2000 27.5% Decline
Wyoming #75 673 2002 Insufficient historical volume
Utah #182 3,926 1999 58.9% Decline
New Hampshire #103 1,413 2002 53.1% Decline
Idaho #134 1,773 2000 31.0% Decline
Vermont Unranked 753 2002 Insufficient historical volume
Tennessee #106 9,248 2000 34.8% Decline
Arkansas #185 4,392 2000 55.6% Decline
Oregon #175 3,649 2000 59.3% Decline
Virginia #119 8,769 2000 47.8% Decline
Montana #72 1,164 2003 Insufficient historical volume
Florida #143 13,035 2000 34.5% Decline
Washington #116 6,076 2000 53.4% Decline
Oklahoma #115 5,100 1999 22.6% Decline
Arizona #138 4,503 2000 37.9% Decline
Maine #96 1,595 2000 Insufficient historical volume
West Virginia #60 3,318 2002 37.8% Decline
Kentucky #83 6,087 2001 39.2% Decline
North Carolina #110 9,950 2000 21.0% Decline
North Dakota #161 1,176 2000 Insufficient historical volume
Colorado #132 4,099 1999 32.5% Decline
Alabama #92 6,273 2000 24.3% Decline
Louisiana #126 6,049 1998 34.9% Decline
Georgia #125 9,204 1999 38.2% Decline
Delaware #106 664 2001 Insufficient historical volume
South Carolina #93 4,554 1999 27.0% Decline
South Dakota #236 1,056 2001 Insufficient historical volume
Kansas #96 3,238 2000 24.0% Decline
Hawaii #130 932 2002 68.0% Decline
Missouri #100 6,638 2006 42.6% Decline
Indiana #107 7,042 2001 39.7% Decline
Minnesota #153 5,467 2000 52.7% Decline
Mississippi #100 3,615 1999 3.3% Decline
Wisconsin #139 5,627 2000 41.6% Decline
Iowa #319 3,691 2000 70.7% Decline
Nebraska #218 2,002 2000 66.7% Decline
Michigan #110 9,727 2000 48.2% Decline
Texas #161 19,621 2000 29.6% Decline
Ohio #134 11,056 2000 48.2% Decline
Maryland #112 3,534 2000 42.7% Decline
New Mexico #138 1,130 2015 51.7% Decline
Pennsylvania #107 10,330 2000 39.0% Decline
Connecticut #120 2,111 2002 59.0% Decline
Rhode Island #55 642 2018 Insufficient historical volume
California #167 17,081 2015 49.3% Decline
Massachusetts #121 3,520 2014 50.4% Decline
Illinois #143 6,999 2000 44.7% Decline
New Jersey #115 3,674 2017 41.7% Decline
New York #151 9,915 2014 54.2% Decline
District of Columbia Unranked 135 2013 Insufficient historical volume

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§ Sibling Name Suggestions

πŸ‘¦ Brother Suggestions
πŸ‘§ Sister Suggestions

πŸ”— Names You Might Also Like

If you love the internal rhythm structural framework metrics of Hunter, consider these high-cohesion alternative profiles:

Demographic & Volume Sound Character Peers

πŸ—‚οΈ Browse More Baby Names Directory

Explore our programmatic data indexes across multi-variate sorting tracks safely: