Baby Name Popularity Profile

Miller

Data-driven popularity statistics, SSA rankings, and historical trends for the name Miller.

National Rank (2025)
#369
All-Time Peak Rank
#369 (2025)
Total U.S. Births
11,172
Unisex Distribution 80.2% Boy / 19.8% Girl Balance: Leans Male
πŸ’‘ The Miller Vibe: This choice is considered a Rising Star. A high-velocity modern choice demonstrating rapid, sustained growth in recent registries.

πŸ“– The Story Behind Miller

According to SSA data, Miller achieved its highest historical rank of #369 in 2025. Its highest annual registration volume occurred in 2025 with 864 babies. Between 2015 and 2025, modern registrations have increased by 217.6%. Overall, the name has maintained a ranked presence for 146 consecutive years.

πŸ“Š Factual Timeline & Current Trajectory (1880 – 2025)

Watch how the absolute registration footprint of the name Miller scaled historically over the last century:

5-Year Trajectory Velocity Fast Rising
10-Year Decadal Shift Change +217.6% Growth
18801920196020002025

πŸ“ˆ Popularity Milestones & Volatility

Busiest Year on Record 864 Births in 2025
Years in Top 100
0 yrs
Registry Appearance Streak
146 Years
Historical Volatility Highly Volatile
Decade-by-Decade Registration Volumes
1880s: 102
1890s: 98
1900s: 140
1910s: 526
1920s: 726
1930s: 505
1940s: 399
1950s: 402
1960s: 269
1970s: 233
1980s: 210
1990s: 511
2000s: 1,196
2010s: 2,407
2020s: 3,448

πŸ“ Sound & Spelling Structure

Phonetic Syllables Mil-ler
Letter Count 6 Letters
Spelling Complexity Moderate
Linguistic Profile Narrative: Longer than 25.7% of SSA names. Starts with M, a letter used by only 7.6% of SSA names.

πŸ› οΈ Rhythm & Cadence Engine

Need a middle name or matching choice that pairs cleanly with Miller? Enter a surname or older sibling name below to test structural meter and syllable cohesion:

πŸ“ Authentic State & Regional Rankings

Highest Ranking Local Zone State Georgia
Strongest Geographic Region Footprint South
States with Core Active Data 43 States Regions
State Region 2025 Absolute Rank Total Historical Births Peak Year 5-Year Velocity
Georgia #244 709 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Alabama #183 424 2022 Insufficient historical volume
South Carolina #284 303 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Tennessee #252 429 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Mississippi #277 236 2024 Insufficient historical volume
North Carolina #241 496 2025 +100.0% Growth
Utah #282 101 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Louisiana #187 209 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Texas #379 853 2025 +188.2% Growth
Arkansas #216 115 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Washington #360 146 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Kentucky #243 152 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Florida #504 255 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Missouri #250 164 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Oklahoma #242 91 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Colorado #456 76 2023 Insufficient historical volume
Indiana #263 141 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Virginia #403 130 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Kansas #288 58 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Arizona #550 67 2025 Insufficient historical volume
California #633 523 2025 +36.4% Growth
Maine Unranked 18 2022 Insufficient historical volume
Minnesota #352 71 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Idaho #362 13 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Connecticut #245 36 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Illinois #525 161 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Michigan #416 118 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Wisconsin #468 62 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Nevada Unranked 10 2014 Insufficient historical volume
Pennsylvania #734 160 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Vermont Unranked 5 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Ohio #531 133 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Massachusetts #498 63 2023 Insufficient historical volume
Maryland #498 36 2025 Insufficient historical volume
New York #651 178 2025 Insufficient historical volume
New Hampshire Unranked 7 2023 Insufficient historical volume
Nebraska #260 16 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Iowa #324 28 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Oregon #391 17 2025 Insufficient historical volume
South Dakota Unranked 6 2024 Insufficient historical volume
North Dakota #217 6 2025 Insufficient historical volume
New Jersey Unranked 39 2023 Insufficient historical volume
New Mexico Unranked 5 2024 Insufficient historical volume

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§ Sibling Name Suggestions

πŸ”— Names You Might Also Like

If you love the internal rhythm structural framework metrics of Miller, consider these high-cohesion alternative profiles:

Demographic & Volume Sound Character Peers

πŸ—‚οΈ Browse More Baby Names Directory

Explore our programmatic data indexes across multi-variate sorting tracks safely: