Baby Name Popularity Profile

Samuel

Data-driven popularity statistics, SSA rankings, and historical trends for the name Samuel.

National Rank (2025)
#18
All-Time Peak Rank
#17 (1880)
Total U.S. Births
820,196
Unisex Distribution 99.6% Boy / 0.4% Girl Balance: Overwhelmingly Male
πŸ’‘ The Samuel Vibe: This choice is considered a Perennial Favorite. A historic staple that has maintained dominant national popularity for over half a century.

πŸ“– The Story Behind Samuel

According to SSA data, Samuel achieved its highest historical rank of #17 in 1880. Its highest annual registration volume occurred in 2001 with 14,813 babies. Between 2015 and 2025, modern registrations have decreased by 23.6%. Overall, the name has maintained a ranked presence for 146 consecutive years.

πŸ“Š Factual Timeline & Current Trajectory (1880 – 2025)

Watch how the absolute registration footprint of the name Samuel scaled historically over the last century:

5-Year Trajectory Velocity Stable
10-Year Decadal Shift Change -23.6% Decline
18801920196020002025

πŸ“ˆ Popularity Milestones & Volatility

Busiest Year on Record 14,813 Births in 2001
Years in Top 100
146 yrs
Registry Appearance Streak
146 Years
Historical Volatility Very Stable
Decade-by-Decade Registration Volumes
1880s: 9,129
1890s: 7,857
1900s: 8,149
1910s: 34,166
1920s: 43,362
1930s: 32,135
1940s: 43,129
1950s: 53,767
1960s: 44,247
1970s: 48,099
1980s: 73,456
1990s: 125,597
2000s: 138,647
2010s: 108,128
2020s: 50,328

πŸ“ Sound & Spelling Structure

Phonetic Syllables Sa-mue
Letter Count 6 Letters
Spelling Complexity Moderate
Linguistic Profile Narrative: It is an isogram, meaning no two letters are repeated. Longer than 25.7% of SSA names. Starts with S, a letter used by only 7.9% of SSA names.

πŸ› οΈ Rhythm & Cadence Engine

Need a middle name or matching choice that pairs cleanly with Samuel? Enter a surname or older sibling name below to test structural meter and syllable cohesion:

πŸ“ Authentic State & Regional Rankings

Highest Ranking Local Zone State Alaska
Strongest Geographic Region Footprint South
States with Core Active Data 51 States Regions
State Region 2025 Absolute Rank Total Historical Births Peak Year 5-Year Velocity
Alaska #14 1,883 2004 Stable
South Carolina #14 17,769 1948 +13.8% Growth
Delaware #33 2,348 1997 Insufficient historical volume
Utah #28 9,177 2004 25.0% Decline
Virginia #15 24,747 2002 3.8% Decline
Alabama #8 19,663 2005 +22.8% Growth
District of Columbia #12 4,744 1992 Stable
North Carolina #13 30,271 2003 +6.7% Growth
Tennessee #14 21,631 2003 0.8% Decline
Idaho #21 3,951 2010 22.2% Decline
Hawaii #36 3,042 1998 Insufficient historical volume
Maryland #23 14,749 2000 6.4% Decline
New Hampshire #48 3,052 2004 Stable
Georgia #19 26,982 2007 9.1% Decline
Oregon #18 8,599 1999 2.8% Decline
Colorado #32 11,350 2003 12.2% Decline
Florida #22 31,660 2005 +0.8% Growth
Mississippi #19 11,686 1949 12.2% Decline
New Mexico #21 4,940 1996 4.3% Decline
Nevada #27 3,047 2005 +3.0% Growth
Arizona #23 11,005 2005 Stable
Washington #9 14,503 2003 +16.0% Growth
Pennsylvania #21 47,986 1918 1.8% Decline
West Virginia #25 8,112 1949 +7.5% Growth
Vermont Unranked 1,483 1988 Insufficient historical volume
Wyoming Unranked 1,149 2006 Insufficient historical volume
Arkansas #12 9,170 2003 +2.1% Growth
Maine #81 3,702 2004 40.7% Decline
Kentucky #15 14,090 2003 +0.7% Growth
Minnesota #34 14,870 2001 14.8% Decline
Texas #16 61,287 2005 +3.7% Growth
Montana #27 2,440 1996 Insufficient historical volume
Indiana #13 18,544 1997 +2.7% Growth
Missouri #15 17,295 2002 +1.7% Growth
Connecticut #32 8,346 1999 +12.3% Growth
Massachusetts #17 18,118 2001 +4.1% Growth
Kansas #24 7,687 2007 1.2% Decline
Oklahoma #13 9,877 2005 +21.2% Growth
Louisiana #15 13,004 1949 +21.5% Growth
New Jersey #36 19,360 2001 10.8% Decline
California #34 69,781 2001 12.5% Decline
Nebraska #24 5,070 2004 +5.6% Growth
Ohio #30 31,852 2001 3.0% Decline
Rhode Island #59 2,513 2002 48.5% Decline
New York #38 52,939 2001 25.6% Decline
Wisconsin #27 13,599 2001 +20.0% Growth
South Dakota #49 2,104 1991 16.0% Decline
Illinois #31 30,078 1997 9.2% Decline
Iowa #34 7,388 1999 11.4% Decline
Michigan #37 20,185 2001 5.1% Decline
North Dakota #34 1,639 2003 Insufficient historical volume

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§ Sibling Name Suggestions

πŸ‘¦ Brother Suggestions
πŸ‘§ Sister Suggestions

πŸ”— Names You Might Also Like

If you love the internal rhythm structural framework metrics of Samuel, consider these high-cohesion alternative profiles:

Demographic & Volume Sound Character Peers

πŸ—‚οΈ Browse More Baby Names Directory

Explore our programmatic data indexes across multi-variate sorting tracks safely: