Baby Name Popularity Profile

Wells

Data-driven popularity statistics, SSA rankings, and historical trends for the name Wells.

National Rank (2025)
#347
All-Time Peak Rank
#347 (2025)
Total U.S. Births
6,989
Unisex Distribution 97.6% Boy / 2.4% Girl Balance: Overwhelmingly Male
πŸ’‘ The Wells Vibe: This choice is considered a Rising Star. A high-velocity modern choice demonstrating rapid, sustained growth in recent registries.

πŸ“– The Story Behind Wells

According to SSA data, Wells achieved its highest historical rank of #347 in 2025. Its highest annual registration volume occurred in 2025 with 944 babies. Between 2015 and 2025, modern registrations have increased by 960.7%. Overall, the name has maintained a ranked presence for 43 consecutive years.

πŸ“Š Factual Timeline & Current Trajectory (1880 – 2025)

Watch how the absolute registration footprint of the name Wells scaled historically over the last century:

5-Year Trajectory Velocity Fast Rising
10-Year Decadal Shift Change +960.7% Growth
18801920196020002025

πŸ“ˆ Popularity Milestones & Volatility

Busiest Year on Record 944 Births in 2025
Years in Top 100
0 yrs
Registry Appearance Streak
43 Years
Historical Volatility Highly Volatile
Decade-by-Decade Registration Volumes
1880s: 16
1890s: 5
1900s: 6
1910s: 172
1920s: 193
1930s: 119
1940s: 110
1950s: 90
1960s: 68
1970s: 87
1980s: 71
1990s: 103
2000s: 166
2010s: 1,473
2020s: 4,310

πŸ“ Sound & Spelling Structure

Phonetic Syllables Wells
Letter Count 5 Letters
Spelling Complexity Moderate
Linguistic Profile Narrative: Longer than 7.7% of SSA names. Starts with W, a letter used by only 1.1% of SSA names.

πŸ› οΈ Rhythm & Cadence Engine

Need a middle name or matching choice that pairs cleanly with Wells? Enter a surname or older sibling name below to test structural meter and syllable cohesion:

πŸ“ Authentic State & Regional Rankings

Highest Ranking Local Zone State Utah
Strongest Geographic Region Footprint South
States with Core Active Data 43 States Regions
State Region 2025 Absolute Rank Total Historical Births Peak Year 5-Year Velocity
Utah #104 340 2025 +54.5% Growth
South Carolina #264 186 2022 21.4% Decline
Colorado #216 150 2025 Insufficient historical volume
North Dakota #106 37 2025 Insufficient historical volume
North Carolina #232 308 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Nebraska #178 76 2021 Insufficient historical volume
Tennessee #242 213 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Idaho #373 39 2023 Insufficient historical volume
Minnesota #326 177 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Iowa #230 114 2024 Insufficient historical volume
New Hampshire #129 27 2025 Insufficient historical volume
South Dakota #169 29 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Kansas #159 88 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Alabama #287 148 2023 Insufficient historical volume
Georgia #405 222 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Oregon #294 66 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Arizona #525 85 2023 Insufficient historical volume
Virginia #363 152 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Texas #413 498 2025 +88.9% Growth
Montana #172 19 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Indiana #409 143 2023 Insufficient historical volume
Wisconsin #299 120 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Washington #363 90 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Kentucky #266 92 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Maryland #363 77 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Arkansas #552 55 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Michigan #287 181 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Oklahoma #249 63 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Missouri #290 102 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Florida #582 153 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Massachusetts #358 107 2021 Insufficient historical volume
Ohio #332 197 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Illinois #344 204 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Mississippi #236 48 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Louisiana #400 68 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Maine #203 13 2025 Insufficient historical volume
California #844 289 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Connecticut #323 27 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Pennsylvania #426 106 2025 Insufficient historical volume
New York #713 140 2023 Insufficient historical volume
Nevada Unranked 6 2022 Insufficient historical volume
New Jersey #908 31 2023 Insufficient historical volume
District of Columbia #204 5 2025 Insufficient historical volume

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§ Sibling Name Suggestions

πŸ‘¦ Brother Suggestions
πŸ‘§ Sister Suggestions

πŸ”— Names You Might Also Like

If you love the internal rhythm structural framework metrics of Wells, consider these high-cohesion alternative profiles:

Demographic & Volume Sound Character Peers

πŸ—‚οΈ Browse More Baby Names Directory

Explore our programmatic data indexes across multi-variate sorting tracks safely: