Baby Name Popularity Profile

Ember

Data-driven popularity statistics, SSA rankings, and historical trends for the name Ember.

National Rank (2025)
#154
All-Time Peak Rank
#135 (2024)
Total U.S. Births
22,646
Unisex Distribution 1.8% Boy / 98.2% Girl Balance: Overwhelmingly Female
πŸ’‘ The Ember Vibe: This choice is considered a Rising Star. A high-velocity modern choice demonstrating rapid, sustained growth in recent registries.

πŸ“– The Story Behind Ember

According to SSA data, Ember achieved its highest historical rank of #135 in 2024. Its highest annual registration volume occurred in 2024 with 2,183 babies. Between 2015 and 2025, modern registrations have increased by 116.4%. Overall, the name has maintained a ranked presence for 60 consecutive years.

πŸ“Š Factual Timeline & Current Trajectory (1880 – 2025)

Watch how the absolute registration footprint of the name Ember scaled historically over the last century:

5-Year Trajectory Velocity Rising
10-Year Decadal Shift Change +116.4% Growth
18801920196020002025

πŸ“ˆ Popularity Milestones & Volatility

Busiest Year on Record 2,183 Births in 2024
Years in Top 100
0 yrs
Registry Appearance Streak
60 Years
Historical Volatility Highly Volatile
Decade-by-Decade Registration Volumes
1880s: 0
1890s: 0
1900s: 0
1910s: 0
1920s: 0
1930s: 0
1940s: 8
1950s: 17
1960s: 71
1970s: 285
1980s: 463
1990s: 629
2000s: 1,598
2010s: 8,583
2020s: 10,992

πŸ“ Sound & Spelling Structure

Phonetic Syllables Em-ber
Letter Count 5 Letters
Spelling Complexity Moderate
Linguistic Profile Narrative: Longer than 7.7% of SSA names. Starts with E, a letter used by only 3.9% of SSA names.

πŸ› οΈ Rhythm & Cadence Engine

Need a middle name or matching choice that pairs cleanly with Ember? Enter a surname or older sibling name below to test structural meter and syllable cohesion:

πŸ“ Authentic State & Regional Rankings

Highest Ranking Local Zone State Alaska
Strongest Geographic Region Footprint Northeast
States with Core Active Data 49 States Regions
State Region 2025 Absolute Rank Total Historical Births Peak Year 5-Year Velocity
Alaska #32 140 2021 Insufficient historical volume
Utah #129 678 2024 8.1% Decline
Wyoming #18 109 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Idaho #42 313 2021 +34.6% Growth
Montana #41 206 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Nevada #88 201 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Oregon #78 488 2022 +5.4% Growth
Washington #102 802 2020 17.6% Decline
Colorado #90 595 2022 +27.3% Growth
Arizona #126 571 2024 +42.9% Growth
Oklahoma #123 583 2022 29.3% Decline
South Dakota #41 130 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Arkansas #84 389 2021 8.8% Decline
Kansas #75 373 2024 +37.0% Growth
Missouri #55 694 2025 +58.0% Growth
Florida #185 1,015 2024 +42.0% Growth
North Dakota #83 98 2015 Insufficient historical volume
Tennessee #140 597 2022 Stable
Nebraska #107 193 2023 Insufficient historical volume
Indiana #77 613 2025 +94.7% Growth
Iowa #105 338 2022 Insufficient historical volume
Texas #236 1,844 2024 +30.4% Growth
Virginia #110 537 2025 +58.5% Growth
Kentucky #97 395 2024 +43.3% Growth
West Virginia #64 207 2022 Insufficient historical volume
Wisconsin #116 429 2021 +30.3% Growth
North Carolina #150 616 2025 +70.0% Growth
Maine #104 89 2020 Insufficient historical volume
South Carolina #149 289 2023 +14.8% Growth
New Mexico #56 105 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Georgia #240 543 2023 6.4% Decline
Michigan #143 731 2021 +5.5% Growth
Ohio #115 854 2025 +40.0% Growth
Hawaii #72 56 2023 Insufficient historical volume
California #252 1,625 2024 +22.2% Growth
Louisiana #307 287 2021 Insufficient historical volume
New Hampshire #142 47 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Minnesota #106 259 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Alabama #227 249 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Pennsylvania #140 713 2022 +29.3% Growth
Mississippi #278 145 2022 Insufficient historical volume
Maryland #315 169 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Illinois #181 538 2024 Stable
Massachusetts #494 133 2024 Insufficient historical volume
New York #344 380 2025 +53.1% Growth
Connecticut #256 48 2025 Insufficient historical volume
New Jersey #544 120 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Rhode Island #195 10 2020 Insufficient historical volume
Delaware Unranked 5 2019 Insufficient historical volume

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§ Sibling Name Suggestions

πŸ‘¦ Brother Suggestions
πŸ‘§ Sister Suggestions

πŸ”— Names You Might Also Like

If you love the internal rhythm structural framework metrics of Ember, consider these high-cohesion alternative profiles:

Demographic & Volume Sound Character Peers

πŸ—‚οΈ Browse More Baby Names Directory

Explore our programmatic data indexes across multi-variate sorting tracks safely: