Baby Name Popularity Profile

Boone

Data-driven popularity statistics, SSA rankings, and historical trends for the name Boone.

National Rank (2025)
#423
All-Time Peak Rank
#423 (2025)
Total U.S. Births
6,887
Unisex Distribution 99.9% Boy / 0.1% Girl Balance: Single-Gender Archetype
πŸ’‘ The Boone Vibe: This choice is considered a Rising Star. A high-velocity modern choice demonstrating rapid, sustained growth in recent registries.

πŸ“– The Story Behind Boone

According to SSA data, Boone achieved its highest historical rank of #423 in 2025. Its highest annual registration volume occurred in 2025 with 762 babies. Between 2015 and 2025, modern registrations have increased by 243.2%. Overall, the name has maintained a ranked presence for 53 consecutive years.

πŸ“Š Factual Timeline & Current Trajectory (1880 – 2025)

Watch how the absolute registration footprint of the name Boone scaled historically over the last century:

5-Year Trajectory Velocity Fast Rising
10-Year Decadal Shift Change +243.2% Growth
18801920196020002025

πŸ“ˆ Popularity Milestones & Volatility

Busiest Year on Record 762 Births in 2025
Years in Top 100
0 yrs
Registry Appearance Streak
53 Years
Historical Volatility Highly Volatile
Decade-by-Decade Registration Volumes
1880s: 5
1890s: 0
1900s: 5
1910s: 55
1920s: 89
1930s: 41
1940s: 13
1950s: 14
1960s: 23
1970s: 102
1980s: 225
1990s: 290
2000s: 496
2010s: 2,300
2020s: 3,229

πŸ“ Sound & Spelling Structure

Phonetic Syllables Boone
Letter Count 5 Letters
Spelling Complexity Moderate
Linguistic Profile Narrative: Longer than 7.7% of SSA names. Starts with B, a letter used by only 3.6% of SSA names.

πŸ› οΈ Rhythm & Cadence Engine

Need a middle name or matching choice that pairs cleanly with Boone? Enter a surname or older sibling name below to test structural meter and syllable cohesion:

πŸ“ Authentic State & Regional Rankings

Highest Ranking Local Zone State Utah
Strongest Geographic Region Footprint South
States with Core Active Data 39 States Regions
State Region 2025 Absolute Rank Total Historical Births Peak Year 5-Year Velocity
Utah #151 168 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Idaho #168 66 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Tennessee #186 352 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Montana #99 47 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Nebraska #174 102 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Kentucky #222 237 2025 Insufficient historical volume
North Carolina #339 332 2018 +9.7% Growth
Missouri #264 255 2020 10.3% Decline
Oregon #332 97 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Iowa #207 139 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Washington #508 169 2020 Insufficient historical volume
Wyoming Unranked 13 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Oklahoma #211 121 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Arkansas #199 92 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Wisconsin #235 165 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Kansas #249 81 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Georgia #387 211 2025 Insufficient historical volume
South Carolina #288 109 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Indiana #267 174 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Colorado #389 86 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Ohio #266 331 2025 +67.9% Growth
South Dakota #117 24 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Texas #539 494 2025 +76.5% Growth
North Dakota #195 22 2020 Insufficient historical volume
Minnesota #395 108 2022 Insufficient historical volume
Alaska Unranked 7 2021 Insufficient historical volume
Florida #650 164 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Alabama #361 82 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Virginia #740 85 2021 Insufficient historical volume
Arizona #563 42 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Michigan #325 118 2025 Insufficient historical volume
West Virginia Unranked 26 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Pennsylvania #707 108 2024 Insufficient historical volume
California #798 195 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Illinois #641 90 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Nevada Unranked 5 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Louisiana #791 10 2019 Insufficient historical volume
New York Unranked 32 2021 Insufficient historical volume
Maryland Unranked 5 2024 Insufficient historical volume

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§ Sibling Name Suggestions

πŸ‘¦ Brother Suggestions
πŸ‘§ Sister Suggestions

πŸ”— Names You Might Also Like

If you love the internal rhythm structural framework metrics of Boone, consider these high-cohesion alternative profiles:

Demographic & Volume Sound Character Peers

πŸ—‚οΈ Browse More Baby Names Directory

Explore our programmatic data indexes across multi-variate sorting tracks safely: