Baby Name Popularity Profile

Briggs

Data-driven popularity statistics, SSA rankings, and historical trends for the name Briggs.

National Rank (2025)
#356
All-Time Peak Rank
#327 (2024)
Total U.S. Births
9,377
Unisex Distribution 99.0% Boy / 1.0% Girl Balance: Overwhelmingly Male
πŸ’‘ The Briggs Vibe: This choice is considered a Rising Star. A high-velocity modern choice demonstrating rapid, sustained growth in recent registries.

πŸ“– The Story Behind Briggs

According to SSA data, Briggs achieved its highest historical rank of #327 in 2024. Its highest annual registration volume occurred in 2024 with 1,059 babies. Between 2015 and 2025, modern registrations have increased by 184.3%. Overall, the name has maintained a ranked presence for 37 consecutive years.

πŸ“Š Factual Timeline & Current Trajectory (1880 – 2025)

Watch how the absolute registration footprint of the name Briggs scaled historically over the last century:

5-Year Trajectory Velocity Rising
10-Year Decadal Shift Change +184.3% Growth
18801920196020002025

πŸ“ˆ Popularity Milestones & Volatility

Busiest Year on Record 1,059 Births in 2024
Years in Top 100
0 yrs
Registry Appearance Streak
37 Years
Historical Volatility Highly Volatile
Decade-by-Decade Registration Volumes
1880s: 0
1890s: 0
1900s: 0
1910s: 0
1920s: 10
1930s: 5
1940s: 11
1950s: 18
1960s: 32
1970s: 5
1980s: 42
1990s: 152
2000s: 623
2010s: 3,145
2020s: 5,334

πŸ“ Sound & Spelling Structure

Phonetic Syllables Briggs
Letter Count 6 Letters
Spelling Complexity Moderate
Linguistic Profile Narrative: Longer than 25.7% of SSA names. Starts with B, a letter used by only 3.6% of SSA names.

πŸ› οΈ Rhythm & Cadence Engine

Need a middle name or matching choice that pairs cleanly with Briggs? Enter a surname or older sibling name below to test structural meter and syllable cohesion:

πŸ“ Authentic State & Regional Rankings

Highest Ranking Local Zone State Utah
Strongest Geographic Region Footprint South
States with Core Active Data 42 States Regions
State Region 2025 Absolute Rank Total Historical Births Peak Year 5-Year Velocity
Utah #141 596 2023 +8.8% Growth
South Dakota #107 180 2019 Insufficient historical volume
North Dakota #55 160 2020 Insufficient historical volume
Idaho #199 149 2022 Insufficient historical volume
Nebraska #114 234 2023 Insufficient historical volume
Iowa #208 327 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Minnesota #141 441 2021 +15.0% Growth
Louisiana #148 401 2024 2.9% Decline
Montana #235 66 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Kansas #329 158 2021 Insufficient historical volume
Wyoming #94 17 2022 Insufficient historical volume
Wisconsin #204 249 2023 Insufficient historical volume
South Carolina #313 178 2023 Insufficient historical volume
Colorado #369 146 2021 Insufficient historical volume
Arizona #643 144 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Georgia #294 327 2025 +44.8% Growth
Indiana #247 272 2023 Insufficient historical volume
Oklahoma #330 153 2023 Insufficient historical volume
Tennessee #282 236 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Texas #403 840 2024 +25.7% Growth
Mississippi #174 136 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Alabama #186 186 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Arkansas #200 107 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Missouri #351 168 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Kentucky #283 124 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Ohio #290 325 2023 Insufficient historical volume
North Carolina #462 198 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Oregon #402 60 2022 Insufficient historical volume
Illinois #457 318 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Florida #421 220 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Washington #818 102 2023 Insufficient historical volume
Michigan #314 217 2023 Insufficient historical volume
West Virginia #229 46 2023 Insufficient historical volume
Virginia #476 92 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Nevada Unranked 11 2024 Insufficient historical volume
Pennsylvania #332 168 2025 Insufficient historical volume
Maryland #822 44 2024 Insufficient historical volume
California #911 244 2023 Insufficient historical volume
Maine #235 5 2025 Insufficient historical volume
New York #1066 56 2021 Insufficient historical volume
Connecticut Unranked 5 2022 Insufficient historical volume
Massachusetts #706 6 2025 Insufficient historical volume

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§ Sibling Name Suggestions

πŸ‘¦ Brother Suggestions
πŸ‘§ Sister Suggestions

πŸ”— Names You Might Also Like

If you love the internal rhythm structural framework metrics of Briggs, consider these high-cohesion alternative profiles:

Demographic & Volume Sound Character Peers

πŸ—‚οΈ Browse More Baby Names Directory

Explore our programmatic data indexes across multi-variate sorting tracks safely: