Baby Name Popularity Profile

Everly

Data-driven popularity statistics, SSA rankings, and historical trends for the name Everly.

National Rank (2025)
#91
All-Time Peak Rank
#42 (2019)
Total U.S. Births
43,374
Unisex Distribution 0.1% Boy / 99.9% Girl Balance: Single-Gender Archetype
πŸ’‘ The Everly Vibe: This choice is considered a Modern Trend. A contemporary choice reflecting current cultural naming rhythms and popularity brackets.

πŸ“– The Story Behind Everly

According to SSA data, Everly achieved its highest historical rank of #42 in 2019. Its highest annual registration volume occurred in 2019 with 4,782 babies. Between 2015 and 2025, modern registrations have increased by 15.6%. Overall, the name has maintained a ranked presence for 24 consecutive years.

πŸ“Š Factual Timeline & Current Trajectory (1880 – 2025)

Watch how the absolute registration footprint of the name Everly scaled historically over the last century:

5-Year Trajectory Velocity Declining
10-Year Decadal Shift Change +15.6% Growth
18801920196020002025

πŸ“ˆ Popularity Milestones & Volatility

Busiest Year on Record 4,782 Births in 2019
Years in Top 100
9 yrs
Registry Appearance Streak
24 Years
Historical Volatility Highly Volatile
Decade-by-Decade Registration Volumes
1880s: 0
1890s: 0
1900s: 0
1910s: 0
1920s: 0
1930s: 0
1940s: 5
1950s: 0
1960s: 5
1970s: 0
1980s: 26
1990s: 12
2000s: 256
2010s: 21,248
2020s: 21,822

πŸ“ Sound & Spelling Structure

Phonetic Syllables Eve-r-ly
Letter Count 6 Letters
Spelling Complexity Moderate
Linguistic Profile Narrative: Longer than 25.7% of SSA names. Starts with E, a letter used by only 3.9% of SSA names.

πŸ› οΈ Rhythm & Cadence Engine

Need a middle name or matching choice that pairs cleanly with Everly? Enter a surname or older sibling name below to test structural meter and syllable cohesion:

πŸ“ Authentic State & Regional Rankings

Highest Ranking Local Zone State Nevada
Strongest Geographic Region Footprint Northeast
States with Core Active Data 51 States Regions
State Region 2025 Absolute Rank Total Historical Births Peak Year 5-Year Velocity
Nevada #70 371 2020 31.0% Decline
Alaska #77 144 2015 Insufficient historical volume
Idaho #55 358 2020 34.1% Decline
Utah #122 740 2019 53.8% Decline
Colorado #80 928 2021 6.2% Decline
Arizona #79 929 2020 34.0% Decline
North Dakota #63 235 2019 53.6% Decline
New Hampshire #70 208 2020 44.8% Decline
Oregon #79 596 2019 25.0% Decline
South Dakota #53 218 2021 Insufficient historical volume
Minnesota #95 1,185 2019 56.8% Decline
Washington #142 1,035 2018 44.9% Decline
Florida #84 2,095 2019 13.7% Decline
Nebraska #97 442 2021 47.5% Decline
Montana #151 180 2018 Insufficient historical volume
Wisconsin #100 1,126 2019 59.3% Decline
Tennessee #82 1,204 2018 38.5% Decline
Texas #87 4,318 2020 36.4% Decline
Oklahoma #65 719 2020 48.3% Decline
Kansas #97 555 2020 48.4% Decline
Iowa #80 673 2019 35.7% Decline
California #103 4,781 2019 39.5% Decline
North Carolina #125 1,365 2019 47.7% Decline
Wyoming Unranked 64 2021 Insufficient historical volume
Indiana #107 1,119 2020 54.5% Decline
Delaware Unranked 96 2022 Insufficient historical volume
Missouri #98 1,003 2019 49.1% Decline
Kentucky #73 746 2020 44.7% Decline
Virginia #146 945 2020 48.0% Decline
Arkansas #93 450 2019 37.0% Decline
Georgia #140 1,158 2018 42.1% Decline
New Mexico #96 213 2020 51.7% Decline
South Carolina #121 569 2022 40.0% Decline
Maine #85 164 2017 Insufficient historical volume
Ohio #98 1,649 2019 46.8% Decline
Alabama #126 646 2019 59.8% Decline
Connecticut #107 373 2021 28.9% Decline
Michigan #104 1,278 2019 52.6% Decline
Maryland #177 503 2021 46.3% Decline
Hawaii #120 97 2019 Insufficient historical volume
Rhode Island #69 114 2018 Insufficient historical volume
Pennsylvania #78 1,666 2020 41.1% Decline
West Virginia #75 276 2020 53.8% Decline
Louisiana #92 518 2019 16.7% Decline
Illinois #128 1,403 2020 54.3% Decline
Massachusetts #116 685 2019 42.3% Decline
New Jersey #159 768 2020 45.2% Decline
Vermont #68 47 2019 Insufficient historical volume
Mississippi #254 326 2019 73.2% Decline
New York #156 1,533 2021 31.1% Decline
District of Columbia Unranked 15 2019 Insufficient historical volume

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§ Sibling Name Suggestions

πŸ”— Names You Might Also Like

If you love the internal rhythm structural framework metrics of Everly, consider these high-cohesion alternative profiles:

Demographic & Volume Sound Character Peers

πŸ—‚οΈ Browse More Baby Names Directory

Explore our programmatic data indexes across multi-variate sorting tracks safely: