Baby Name Popularity Profile

Harper

Data-driven popularity statistics, SSA rankings, and historical trends for the name Harper.

National Rank (2025)
#16
All-Time Peak Rank
#9 (2018)
Total U.S. Births
139,063
Unisex Distribution 4.6% Boy / 95.4% Girl Balance: Overwhelmingly Female
πŸ’‘ The Harper Vibe: This choice is considered a Modern Trend. A contemporary choice reflecting current cultural naming rhythms and popularity brackets.

πŸ“– The Story Behind Harper

According to SSA data, Harper achieved its highest historical rank of #9 in 2018. Its highest annual registration volume occurred in 2016 with 10,803 babies. Between 2015 and 2025, modern registrations have decreased by 34.1%. Overall, the name has maintained a ranked presence for 46 consecutive years.

πŸ“Š Factual Timeline & Current Trajectory (1880 – 2025)

Watch how the absolute registration footprint of the name Harper scaled historically over the last century:

5-Year Trajectory Velocity Declining
10-Year Decadal Shift Change -34.1% Decline
18801920196020002025

πŸ“ˆ Popularity Milestones & Volatility

Busiest Year on Record 10,803 Births in 2016
Years in Top 100
15 yrs
Registry Appearance Streak
46 Years
Historical Volatility Highly Volatile
Decade-by-Decade Registration Volumes
1880s: 0
1890s: 0
1900s: 0
1910s: 0
1920s: 0
1930s: 0
1940s: 0
1950s: 0
1960s: 0
1970s: 45
1980s: 82
1990s: 563
2000s: 5,671
2010s: 85,193
2020s: 47,509

πŸ“ Sound & Spelling Structure

Phonetic Syllables Har-per
Letter Count 6 Letters
Spelling Complexity Moderate
Linguistic Profile Narrative: Longer than 25.7% of SSA names. Starts with H, a letter used by only 2.2% of SSA names.

πŸ› οΈ Rhythm & Cadence Engine

Need a middle name or matching choice that pairs cleanly with Harper? Enter a surname or older sibling name below to test structural meter and syllable cohesion:

πŸ“ Authentic State & Regional Rankings

Highest Ranking Local Zone State Alaska
Strongest Geographic Region Footprint Northeast
States with Core Active Data 51 States Regions
State Region 2025 Absolute Rank Total Historical Births Peak Year 5-Year Velocity
Alaska #21 378 2013 Insufficient historical volume
Nevada #54 889 2016 45.9% Decline
Idaho #11 1,051 2018 17.1% Decline
Utah #18 2,144 2016 20.3% Decline
Wyoming #9 339 2015 Insufficient historical volume
New Hampshire #11 743 2019 +16.7% Growth
South Dakota #8 787 2014 34.0% Decline
Colorado #12 2,780 2019 4.5% Decline
Montana #6 700 2018 +2.9% Growth
North Dakota #12 779 2014 25.7% Decline
Nebraska #3 1,513 2014 5.9% Decline
Washington #24 3,323 2018 24.5% Decline
Tennessee #8 4,378 2019 22.5% Decline
Delaware #19 406 2016 23.1% Decline
Arizona #38 2,423 2018 29.4% Decline
Oregon #13 1,788 2016 26.3% Decline
Vermont #10 335 2016 Insufficient historical volume
Kansas #8 1,974 2014 +9.6% Growth
North Carolina #14 5,320 2018 26.2% Decline
Florida #38 6,229 2019 23.1% Decline
Virginia #18 4,074 2016 31.0% Decline
Missouri #10 3,920 2015 30.4% Decline
Oklahoma #8 2,356 2017 22.7% Decline
Minnesota #13 3,190 2018 16.2% Decline
Kentucky #10 2,990 2017 30.7% Decline
Georgia #15 4,795 2019 23.9% Decline
Iowa #9 2,246 2013 10.9% Decline
Indiana #8 3,975 2017 16.3% Decline
Maine #5 724 2018 27.1% Decline
Wisconsin #11 3,216 2016 12.7% Decline
South Carolina #12 2,331 2017 22.8% Decline
Arkansas #8 1,707 2017 30.8% Decline
Alabama #7 2,826 2015 22.3% Decline
Maryland #26 2,312 2016 27.9% Decline
Texas #39 11,145 2016 25.9% Decline
Ohio #11 6,512 2017 26.5% Decline
Michigan #10 4,854 2019 24.2% Decline
Louisiana #6 2,293 2017 22.2% Decline
West Virginia #4 1,068 2016 25.3% Decline
Connecticut #22 1,224 2016 15.6% Decline
Pennsylvania #11 5,700 2019 33.9% Decline
Mississippi #12 1,275 2016 32.2% Decline
Illinois #24 4,609 2014 25.0% Decline
California #62 9,305 2016 30.5% Decline
New Jersey #34 2,491 2019 +14.4% Growth
Hawaii #37 275 2016 Insufficient historical volume
Massachusetts #45 2,120 2018 19.1% Decline
Rhode Island #55 273 2019 Insufficient historical volume
New York #37 5,418 2016 20.2% Decline
New Mexico #36 374 2016 Stable
District of Columbia #60 261 2017 Insufficient historical volume

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§ Sibling Name Suggestions

πŸ‘¦ Brother Suggestions
πŸ‘§ Sister Suggestions

πŸ”— Names You Might Also Like

If you love the internal rhythm structural framework metrics of Harper, consider these high-cohesion alternative profiles:

Demographic & Volume Sound Character Peers

πŸ—‚οΈ Browse More Baby Names Directory

Explore our programmatic data indexes across multi-variate sorting tracks safely: